AI onboarding checklist comparison: correct deadlines, wrong handoff?
Three starters arrive on Monday. Two equipment requests are already late, one identity check is pending, and a manager has said yes to access they cannot authorize. We gave ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude the same fictional roster. WekeyLab AI would start with ChatGPT’s draft: it carries the unresolved approval gates into the email itself. Gemini adds timing requirements the policy never set; Claude calculates the deadlines correctly, then says only two business days remain in its email.
The answer we would hand to a colleague
ChatGPT is our starting point for this run because its draft keeps Noah’s three separate gates visible: identity verification, written laptop-exception approval and security approval for customer data. A teammate can read the email without having to rediscover those conditions in a separate table. It also makes Noah’s 9 a.m. equipment collection conditional on company equipment actually being approved and provided.
That does not make the draft finished. Its checklist asks the two on-site starters about orientation links even though only the remote starter needs one. For Priya, we would add an explicit check that approved customer-data access has actually been provisioned. Both edits are small, but they make the handoff more precise.
Gemini gives clear owner labels; Claude lays out the reverse date calculation particularly well. The useful choice here is the draft requiring the least consequential repair for an English-speaking team, not a universal ranking of the three products.
The task: turn rules into actions, without upgrading a request into approval
The fictional date is Tuesday, September 22, 2026, and all three start Monday, September 28. We specified Monday–Friday business days, no holidays and New York local time. HR must send welcome emails three business days before the start; managers must submit equipment requests five business days before. Missed deadlines must be flagged rather than silently replaced.
Maya is a remote employee: identity complete, equipment requested September 18, no customer-data access needed. Noah is an on-site contractor: identity pending, a laptop exception requested but undecided, no equipment request submitted, and a manager’s yes without the required security decision. Priya is an on-site employee: identity complete and security approval recorded, but no equipment request submitted.
We fixed ten checks before asking each service once, with no response-length limit. Nothing was actually sent to HR or changed in an account system. This tests conversion of a supplied internal policy, not employment law or a real person’s eligibility.
The calendar is simple enough to verify independently
Counting backward from Monday September 28: Friday 25 is one business day, Thursday 24 two, Wednesday 23 three, Tuesday 22 four and Monday 21 five. Therefore welcome emails are due Wednesday 23; equipment requests were due Monday 21. Maya’s September 18 request was on time. Noah and Priya are overdue. All three answers preserve those deadlines.
The important distinction is between recording the missed September 21 deadline and choosing a recovery action today. Asking a manager to coordinate today is useful. Rewriting the original deadline as September 22 would hide the miss.
After today and before the start date, there are three full business days: Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Including today would make four. Neither count supports the two days stated in Claude’s email card.
ChatGPT: the conditions survive the move from table to email
ChatGPT opens by flagging the two missed requests. It separates creating an account from customer-data access and explains that Noah’s manager cannot replace security approval. Its email also keeps the identity block explicit. That is the detail most likely to disappear when a long checklist is compressed into a message.
For day one it says Noah collects equipment at 9 a.m. only if company equipment has been approved or provided. That fits the contractor exception better than a blanket promise that a laptop will be waiting. It also gives everyone 10 a.m. orientation and asks HR for Maya’s actual link.
We would remove the unnecessary on-site link checks and turn Maya’s delivery item into a readiness check with an agreed shipping plan. The answer proposes delivery confirmation; it does not claim a laptop has already arrived. We would also ask IT to confirm Priya’s actual access state, since authorization is not the same as completed provisioning.
ChatGPT: “Identity check is pending, so IT cannot create his account yet.”
Gemini: a clear task matrix adds two extra timing assumptions
Gemini correctly names both deadlines and the separate identity, sponsor and security gates. It also explicitly tells IT to provision Priya’s approved access, rather than treating account creation alone as sufficient. These are usable parts of its response.
Its welcome-email item includes the remote orientation link under the September 23 deadline, and the email repeats that bundle under “Upcoming Hard Deadlines.” Sending the link early is sensible, but the supplied rule setsSeptember 23 for the welcome email, not a separate link-delivery deadline. We would label that bundle a proposed plan.
The logistics section asks whether shipping and reception pickup align with day one at 9 a.m. The 9 a.m. rule applies to on-site collection, not Maya’s delivery. Gemini also mentions 10 a.m. for Maya’s link without clearly repeating that both on-site starters attend then too. A colleague needs all three appointments stated, not inferred.
Gemini: “confirm if shipping/reception pickup dates will align with Day 1 at 9:00 a.m.”
Claude: the checklist and the email disagree about time
Claude provides a readable Korean table and a correct backward business-day calculation, despite receiving the same English question as the others. The prompt did not explicitly forbid another language; for this English-team use case, however, its draft needs translation before handoff.
The separate email card says “입사일까지 영업일 기준 2일 남았습니다,” meaning two business days remain until the start. That conflicts with the dates. The body’s deadline arithmetic is correct, so checking only its opening table would miss the error in the actual email. We saved both the body and the separate card from the same response.
The body correctly blocks Noah’s account, but the email only asks about account status for all three and does not repeat that block. It does not explicitly order IT to create his account; the issue is loss of a critical condition at handoff. Its Maya laptop row also says “in progress” while noting stock and shipping are unknown. We would write “required; allocation and shipping to be confirmed.”
Claude email card, translated: “There are two business days left until the start date.”
WekeyLab AI’s checklist: owner, condition, next action, actual status
HR: send all three welcome emails by Wednesday September 23. Request a shipping address from Maya only. Finish Noah’s identity check and record the result before IT creates his account. Obtain the actual remote orientation link for Maya. The policy requires it for the September 28 session; including it in the welcome email is a proposed convenience.
Manager and equipment team: record Noah’s and Priya’s missedSeptember 21 requests and coordinate recovery. Priya needs a company laptop. Maya’s request was timely, but stock, shipping and delivery remain unconfirmed. Noah uses his own device by default unless the sponsor approves a company laptop in writing; do not treat an exception request as a decision.
IT and Security: check whether Maya’s and Priya’s accounts already exist before creating anything. Keep Noah’s account blocked until identity completion. Noah’s customer-data access still needs Security’s decision. Priya has that approval, but IT must verify actual provisioning. Maya does not need customer-data access.
Day one, New York time: on-site equipment collection is 9 a.m. at reception, with availability confirmed in advance and Noah’s approved equipment arrangement made explicit. All three attend orientation at 10 a.m.; Maya joins with HR’s real link. Keep unknown shipping and stock values visibly unknown instead of filling them with hopeful completion dates.
The message WekeyLab AI would send
This is our edited, reusable draft, combining the useful parts of the three responses and correcting the handoff gaps. “Please reply today” is our proposed follow-up request, not a replacement for the policy’s missed deadline.
Subject: September 28 onboarding — overdue requests and approval gates Team, the equipment-request deadline was Monday September 21. Noah and Priya have no submitted request; please record the misses and coordinate recovery. Maya submittedSeptember 18, but stock, shipping and delivery still need confirmation. HR: send all three welcome emails by Wednesday September 23, request only Maya’s shipping address, and provide her actual 10 a.m. orientation link before the session. Manager/sponsor: confirm Noah’s device arrangement; his own device remains the default until written laptop approval. IT: verify Maya’s and Priya’s account status; do not create Noah’s account until HR completes identity verification. Security must decide Noah’s customer-data access separately. Priya’s approval is recorded; IT should confirm actual provisioning. On-site collection isSeptember 28 at 9 a.m., subject to the confirmed equipment arrangement; everyone attends orientation at 10 a.m., New York time. Please reply today with an owner and next action for each unresolved item. Do not mark approval, shipment or access complete without a record.
How to use this with your own onboarding policy
Start with the actual rule text, dates, location and current status. Keep approval requested, approval recorded and action completed in separate columns. Ask for a handoff email as well as a checklist, then verify that the email retains the same gates as the table.
A reusable instruction is: “Convert this policy and roster into tasks with owner, original deadline, approval prerequisite, next action and recorded status. Flag overdue items without changing their deadlines. Separate your suggested follow-up dates from policy requirements. Draft the team message and preserve all blocking conditions.”
The meeting-action comparison below covers owners and follow-up commitments; the document-version comparison covers changed rules. The same principle applies here: a well-formatted summary helps only if the conditions survive into the instructions someone will actually follow.
Sources and actual records
Actual website collection 22 September 2026,09:04–09:08 KST. Same unrestricted English question once each: ChatGPT Free, Think off, specific model not displayed; Gemini Flash, plan unverified; Claude Free, Sonnet 5 Medium. Claude replied in Korean and included a separate email card; both preserved. Ten precommitted criteria per answer,30 manual findings, with independent date arithmetic and literal evidence quotes. EN is the primary edition; KO/ZH localize this same run, not separate country tests. Synthetic data only. No emails sent or accounts changed. US search volume is unknown; official onboarding workflow documentation was a practical-use signal, not proof of demand.
Atlassian: Employee onboarding workflow
Meeting action items / 회의 행동 항목
Document version comparison / 문서 버전 비교
ChatGPT · 2026-09-22 09:04–09:08 KST
I'm coordinating three new starters and need an onboarding checklist I can hand to our team. Please turn the policy and roster below into practical tasks, explain what still needs checking, and draft the message I should send today. This is a fictional exercise; use only these internal rules, not employment-law assumptions. Today is Tuesday, September 22, 2026. Everyone starts Monday, September 28. Business days are Monday to Friday and there are no holidays in this exercise. All deadlines and meeting times are New York local time. Policy: HR sends the welcome email no later than three business days before the start date. The manager submits the equipment request no later than five business days before the start date. A missed deadline must be flagged for coordination; do not silently move it. Employees get a company laptop. Contractors use their own device unless the project sponsor approves a company laptop in writing. A requested exception is not approval. IT creates an account only after HR marks the identity check complete. Creating an account does not by itself authorize customer-data access. The security lead must approve that access separately; the manager cannot substitute for that approval. Remote starters receive a shipping-address request from HR. On-site starters collect equipment at reception at 9 a.m. on day one. Do not request shipping addresses from on-site starters. Everyone attends orientation at 10 a.m. on day one. Remote starters need a meeting link from HR. Do not invent a link. Roster: Maya: employee, remote; identity check complete; equipment request submitted September 18; customer-data access not needed. Noah: contractor, on-site; identity check pending; company-laptop exception requested but no sponsor decision; equipment request not submitted; customer-data access requested and the manager said yes, but security has not decided. Priya: employee, on-site; identity check complete; equipment request not submitted; customer-data access needed and security approval is recorded. No welcome emails have been sent. Laptop stock, shipping dates, account-creation status, the orientation link and actual delivery are not recorded. What should we do? Here’s a team-ready checklist based only on the stated internal rules. I’d treat the equipment-request deadline for Noah and Priya as missed and requiring coordination today, rather than silently changing the deadline. Onboarding checklist Starter Today / next action Status / what still needs checking Maya Confirm HR welcome email is sent by Wed Sep 23. Request her shipping address. Confirm equipment fulfillment. Identity check complete; equipment request submitted Sep 18; customer-data access not needed. Still check laptop stock, shipping date, and actual delivery. HR also needs to provide the orientation meeting link. Account creation can proceed because identity check is complete, but account status is not recorded. Noah Flag missed equipment-request deadline to the coordination team. Resolve whether the laptop exception is actually approved. Contractor/on-site, so do not request a shipping address. His own device is the default unless the project sponsor approves a company laptop in writing. Identity check is pending, so IT cannot create his account yet. Customer-data access cannot be granted based on the manager's approval; security approval is still required. Check equipment/reception arrangements, account status after identity completion, and orientation link. Priya Flag missed equipment-request deadline to the coordination team and submit/resolve the equipment request. Identity check complete and security approval for customer-data access is recorded. IT can create her account, but account status is not recorded. She is on-site, so no shipping-address request. Check laptop stock, reception collection at 9 a.m. Monday, actual equipment availability, and orientation link. Team-wide checks Today — Tuesday, Sep 22 Flag Noah's and Priya's missed equipment-request deadline for coordination. Get the manager/appropriate coordinator to resolve the outstanding equipment requests. HR prepares/sends all three welcome emails; the policy deadline is Wednesday, Sep 23. HR requests a shipping address only from Maya. Check whether laptop stock is sufficient. Check expected shipping date for Maya. Check whether Noah's written company-laptop exception has actually been approved by the project sponsor. Check Noah's identity-check status; IT must wait for completion before creating his account. Check account-creation status for Maya and Priya. For Noah, keep customer-data access pending until security approves it separately. Confirm the recorded security approval for Priya remains available to the relevant team. Get the actual orientation meeting link from HR; do not invent one. Monday, Sep 28 — day one Maya: receive/confirm laptop delivery. Noah: collect equipment at reception at 9:00 a.m. if company equipment has been approved/provided; otherwise follow the resolved equipment arrangement. Priya: collect equipment at reception at 9:00 a.m. Everyone attends orientation at 10:00 a.m. Maya needs the HR-provided meeting link because she is remote. Do not request shipping addresses from Noah or Priya. Draft message to send today I’d make the missed deadline explicit without implying that the team has already solved the outstanding items: New starter onboarding — Sep 28 Hi team — quick onboarding check for the three starters beginning Monday, September 28. Please note two equipment-request deadlines were missed and need coordination rather than being silently moved: Maya (employee, remote): equipment request was submitted Sep 18. Identity check is complete. HR still needs to send her welcome email by Wednesday, Sep 23 and request her shipping address. Please also confirm laptop stock, shipping date, actual delivery, account status, and the orientation link from HR. Noah (contractor, on-site): equipment request was not submitted by the Sep 21 deadline, so this needs to be flagged/coordinated. His company-laptop exception has been requested but is not approved yet; written project-sponsor approval is required before treating a company laptop as approved. His identity check is still pending, so IT cannot create his account yet. Customer-data access also remains pending because security approval has not been recorded. No shipping address should be requested. Priya (employee, on-site): equipment request was not submitted by the Sep 21 deadline and needs coordination. Identity check is complete and security approval for customer-data access is recorded. Please confirm account creation, laptop availability, and reception collection for 9:00 a.m. Monday. No shipping address should be requested. For all three, HR welcome emails need to be sent no later than Wednesday, Sep 23. Everyone attends orientation at 10:00 a.m. Monday; Maya will need the meeting link from HR. Please flag any unresolved item rather than assuming an approval, delivery, or deadline change. The key principle here is don't treat “requested,” “manager approved,” or “expected” as equivalent to the specific approval/status required by the policy. In particular, Noah has three separate unresolved gates: identity check, laptop exception approval, and security approval for customer-data access.
Gemini · 2026-09-22 09:04–09:08 KST
I'm coordinating three new starters and need an onboarding checklist I can hand to our team. Please turn the policy and roster below into practical tasks, explain what still needs checking, and draft the message I should send today. This is a fictional exercise; use only these internal rules, not employment-law assumptions. Today is Tuesday, September 22, 2026. Everyone starts Monday, September 28. Business days are Monday to Friday and there are no holidays in this exercise. All deadlines and meeting times are New York local time. Policy: HR sends the welcome email no later than three business days before the start date. The manager submits the equipment request no later than five business days before the start date. A missed deadline must be flagged for coordination; do not silently move it. Employees get a company laptop. Contractors use their own device unless the project sponsor approves a company laptop in writing. A requested exception is not approval. IT creates an account only after HR marks the identity check complete. Creating an account does not by itself authorize customer-data access. The security lead must approve that access separately; the manager cannot substitute for that approval. Remote starters receive a shipping-address request from HR. On-site starters collect equipment at reception at 9 a.m. on day one. Do not request shipping addresses from on-site starters. Everyone attends orientation at 10 a.m. on day one. Remote starters need a meeting link from HR. Do not invent a link. Roster: Maya: employee, remote; identity check complete; equipment request submitted September 18; customer-data access not needed. Noah: contractor, on-site; identity check pending; company-laptop exception requested but no sponsor decision; equipment request not submitted; customer-data access requested and the manager said yes, but security has not decided. Priya: employee, on-site; identity check complete; equipment request not submitted; customer-data access needed and security approval is recorded. No welcome emails have been sent. Laptop stock, shipping dates, account-creation status, the orientation link and actual delivery are not recorded. What should we do? Here is the complete onboarding breakdown, compliance analysis, and team communication draft based on your internal policies. Key Deadlines Context Start Date: Monday, September 28, 2026 Equipment Request Deadline (5 business days before start): Monday, September 21, 2026 Welcome Email Deadline (3 business days before start): Wednesday, September 23, 2026 1. Onboarding Checklist by Starter 1 Maya (Employee | Remote) Identity: Complete | Equipment Submitted: Sep 18 [ ] HR Action Required: Send shipping-address request (Maya is remote; do not send to on-site starters). [ ] HR Deadline (Sep 23): Send Welcome Email including the 10:00 a.m. New York orientation meeting link. [ ] IT Action: Create IT account (Identity check is complete). [ ] IT Action: Prepare and ship company laptop upon receiving shipping address. [ ] Access Control: No customer-data access required. 2 Noah (Contractor | On-Site) FLAGGED: Missed Equipment Deadline & Pending Decisions [ ] FLAGGED / MISSED DEADLINE: Equipment request was due September 21. Flagged for coordination—do not silently shift. [ ] Manager Action: Obtain written approval from Project Sponsor for company laptop exception. Requested exception is not approval; contractors use personal devices by default. [ ] HR Action: Complete identity check. [ ] IT Action: Create IT account only after HR marks identity check complete. [ ] Access Control: Await decision from Security Lead regarding customer-data access. Manager approval is invalid. [ ] HR Deadline (Sep 23): Send Welcome Email (Instructing reception collection at 9:00 a.m. New York on Sep 28). [ ] Note: Do NOT request shipping address (On-site starter). 3 Priya (Employee | On-Site) FLAGGED: Missed Equipment Deadline | Identity: Complete [ ] FLAGGED / MISSED DEADLINE: Equipment request was due September 21 and is not submitted. Flagged for coordination. [ ] Manager Action: Immediately submit company laptop request. [ ] IT Action: Create IT account (Identity check is complete). [ ] IT Action: Provision customer-data access (Security Lead approval is recorded; account creation alone is insufficient). [ ] IT/Reception: Prepare laptop for collection at Reception at 9:00 a.m. New York on Day 1. [ ] HR Deadline (Sep 23): Send Welcome Email (Instructing reception collection at 9:00 a.m. New York on Sep 28). [ ] Note: Do NOT request shipping address (On-site starter). 2. What Still Needs Checking & Unknowns The following unrecorded items and compliance gaps require immediate verification: Equipment Deadlines & Exceptions: Noah & Priya: Both missed the 5-business-day equipment request deadline (September 21). These breaches are formally flagged for team coordination. Noah's Laptop: Must confirm if the project sponsor approves a company laptop in writing. Access & Identity Checks: Noah's Identity: HR must mark the identity check complete before IT can create the account. Noah's Customer-Data Access: Security Lead decision is pending. Manager approval does not grant access. Unrecorded Logistics (Requires Immediate Operational Check): Laptop Stock & Delivery: Verify physical laptop stock and confirm if shipping/reception pickup dates will align with Day 1 at 9:00 a.m. IT Account Status: Check if IT accounts for Maya and Priya have actually been provisioned yet. Orientation Meeting Link: HR must generate and supply the 10:00 a.m. orientation video link for Maya (remote starter). 3. Draft Team Message (For Immediate Send Today) Subject: Action Required: Onboarding Coordination & Flagged Deadlines for Sept 28 Starters Team, We are coordinating onboarding for our three new starters joining next Monday, September 28. Please review the flagged items and required actions below to ensure compliance with our internal policies. 🚩 Flagged Issues & Escalations Equipment Request Deadlines Missed: Equipment requests for Noah and Priya were due yesterday (Monday, Sept 21). These are formally flagged for coordination. Noah (Contractor): Laptop Exception: Currently unapproved. Noah will use a personal device unless we receive written approval from the Project Sponsor. Customer-Data Access: Manager sign-off is insufficient. We are awaiting a decision from the Security Lead. Account Creation: Blocked until HR marks the identity check complete. 📋 Task Matrix & Next Steps Starter Type / Location Identity Check Equipment Status Customer-Data Access Immediate Action Required Maya Employee / Remote Complete Submitted (Sep 18) Not Needed HR: Request shipping address & prepare Welcome Email with 10 AM orientation link. IT: Create account & ship laptop. Noah Contractor / On-Site Pending Missed Deadline (Not submitted) Pending Security HR: Complete identity check. Sponsor: Provide written laptop approval if required. Security: Review access request. Priya Employee / On-Site Complete Missed Deadline (Not submitted) Approved (Security) Manager: Submit equipment request immediately. IT: Create account & grant customer-data access; stage laptop for 9 AM reception pickup. ⏱️ Upcoming Hard Deadlines Wednesday, Sept 23: HR must send Welcome Emails to all starters (including 9:00 a.m. reception collection notes for on-site starters and the 10:00 a.m. orientation link for remote starters). Please confirm receipt and update the tracking sheet as these checks are completed. Best regards, [Your Name] To refine or document this process further: Create a Google Doc summarizing this onboarding plan and tracking checklist Draft individual welcome email templates for remote vs on-site starters
Claude · 2026-09-22 09:04–09:08 KST
I'm coordinating three new starters and need an onboarding checklist I can hand to our team. Please turn the policy and roster below into practical tasks, explain what still needs checking, and draft the message I should send today. This is a fictional exercise; use only these internal rules, not employment-law assumptions. Today is Tuesday, September 22, 2026. Everyone starts Monday, September 28. Business days are Monday to Friday and there are no holidays in this exercise. All deadlines and meeting times are New York local time. Policy: HR sends the welcome email no later than three business days before the start date. The manager submits the equipment request no later than five business days before the start date. A missed deadline must be flagged for coordination; do not silently move it. Employees get a company laptop. Contractors use their own device unless the project sponsor approves a company laptop in writing. A requested exception is not approval. IT creates an account only after HR marks the identity check complete. Creating an account does not by itself authorize customer-data access. The security lead must approve that access separately; the manager cannot substitute for that approval. Remote starters receive a shipping-address request from HR. On-site starters collect equipment at reception at 9 a.m. on day one. Do not request shipping addresses from on-site starters. Everyone attends orientation at 10 a.m. on day one. Remote starters need a meeting link from HR. Do not invent a link. Roster: Maya: employee, remote; identity check complete; equipment request submitted September 18; customer-data access not needed. Noah: contractor, on-site; identity check pending; company-laptop exception requested but no sponsor decision; equipment request not submitted; customer-data access requested and the manager said yes, but security has not decided. Priya: employee, on-site; identity check complete; equipment request not submitted; customer-data access needed and security approval is recorded. No welcome emails have been sent. Laptop stock, shipping dates, account-creation status, the orientation link and actual delivery are not recorded. What should we do? ## 핵심 요약 - **환영 이메일 마감(입사 3영업일 전) = 9/23(수)**: 아직 여유 있음, 3명 전원 미발송 - **장비 신청 마감(입사 5영업일 전) = 9/21(월)**: **이미 경과** — Noah, Priya 미신청 상태로 마감 위반 - 계산 기준: 오늘 9/22(화), 입사일 9/28(월). 영업일 역산 — 9/25(금)=−1, 9/24(목)=−2, 9/23(수)=−3, 9/22(화)=−4, 9/21(월)=−5 | 항목 | 마감일 | 상태 | |---|---|---| | 환영 이메일 (HR) | 9/23(수) | 3명 전원 미발송, 내일까지 발송 필요 | | 장비 신청 (매니저) | 9/21(월) | Maya만 준수(9/18 제출), Noah·Priya 위반 | --- ## 인원별 체크리스트 ### Maya (정직원 / 원격) | 태스크 | 담당 | 상태 | |---|---|---| | 신원확인 완료 | HR | 완료 | | 장비 신청 | 매니저 | 완료(9/18, 마감 준수) | | 회사 노트북 배정 | HR/장비팀 | 진행 — 재고·배송 여부 미확인 | | 계정 생성 | IT | 신원확인 완료 후 진행 가능 — 생성 여부 미확인 | | 배송지 요청 | HR | 원격이므로 발송 필요 — 발송 여부 미확인 | | 오리엔테이션 링크 | HR | 원격이므로 필요 — 존재 여부 미확인, 임의 생성 금지 | | 환영 이메일 | HR | **내일(9/23)까지 발송** | | 고객데이터 접근 | - | 불필요, 해당 없음 | ### Noah (계약직 / 대면) | 태스크 | 담당 | 상태 | |---|---|---| | 신원확인 | HR | **보류 — 계정 생성 차단 요인** | | 노트북 예외 승인 | 프로젝트 스폰서 | **미승인.** 예외 "요청"은 승인 아님 → 기본값: 본인 장비 지참 | | 장비 신청 | 매니저 | **미제출 — 마감(9/21) 위반, 조율 필요** | | 계정 생성 | IT | 신원확인 미완료로 대기 | | 고객데이터 접근 | 보안 담당 | **미결.** 매니저 승인은 무효(대체 불가) — 별도 보안 승인 필수, 현재 없음 | | 대면 수령 안내 | - | 9/28 09:00 리셉션 (본인 장비 지참 여부 확정 후 안내) | | 오리엔테이션 | - | 대면 10:00, 링크 불필요 | | 환영 이메일 | HR | 내일(9/23)까지 발송 | ### Priya (정직원 / 대면) | 태스크 | 담당 | 상태 | |---|---|---| | 신원확인 | HR | 완료 | | 장비 신청 | 매니저 | **미제출 — 마감(9/21) 위반, 조율 필요** (노트북 배정 포함) | | 계정 생성 | IT | 신원확인 완료 → 진행 가능, 생성 여부 미확인 | | 고객데이터 접근 승인 | 보안 담당 | 승인 기록 있음 — 단, 계정 생성과 별개로 **접근 권한 별도 부여** 필요 | | 대면 수령 안내 | - | 9/28 09:00 리셉션 — 장비 준비 여부 위 신청 지연으로 리스크 | | 오리엔테이션 | - | 대면 10:00, 링크 불필요 | | 환영 이메일 | HR | 내일(9/23)까지 발송 | --- ## 확인이 필요한 사항 (기록 없음) 1. 노트북 재고 및 배송 소요일 — Maya 원격 배송 가능 여부 2. Priya·Noah 장비 신청 지연분의 9/28 도착 가능 여부 3. 3명 전원의 IT 계정 생성 실제 진행 여부 4. Maya의 오리엔테이션 링크 존재 여부(발급 전 임의 제공 금지) 5. Noah의 노트북 예외 — 프로젝트 스폰서 서면 승인 여부(현재는 "요청"만 있음, 승인 아님) 6. Noah의 고객데이터 접근 — 보안 담당 결정 여부(매니저 승인은 무효) 7. Priya의 고객데이터 접근 — 계정 생성 후 별도 권한 부여 절차 완료 여부 --- ## 오늘 발송할 메시지 초안 (HR·IT·보안·매니저 대상)마감 계산부터 정리하면: 오늘 9/22(화) 기준 **환영 이메일 마감(9/23)은 아직 유효**하지만, **장비 신청 마감(9/21)은 Noah·Priya 두 건 모두 이미 경과**했습니다. Maya는 9/18 제출로 마감을 지켰습니다. 핵심은 세 가지 위반·미결 사항입니다 — ① 장비 신청 2건 지연(조율 필요), ② Noah의 노트북 예외는 "요청"일 뿐 승인이 아니므로 기본값(본인 장비)이 적용되어야 함, ③ Noah/Priya의 고객데이터 접근은 계정 생성이나 매니저 승인과 무관하게 보안 담당자의 별도 승인이 있어야만 유효(Noah는 미결, Priya는 승인 기록 있으나 접근 권한 부여는 별개 절차). 위 표는 인원별 태스크와 담당자, 확인이 필요한 미기록 항목을 정리한 것이고, 메시지 카드는 오늘 발송할 조율 이메일 초안입니다. 필요하면 어조를 더 완화하거나 항목을 줄여드리겠습니다. [Separate email card from the same response] Subject: [긴급] 9/28 입사자 온보딩 마감 위반 2건 및 미결 승인 사항 안녕하세요, 9/28(월) 입사 예정 3명(Maya, Noah, Priya) 온보딩 현황 점검 결과, 마감 위반 및 미결 승인 건을 공유합니다. 입사일까지 영업일 기준 2일 남았습니다. [마감 위반 — 즉시 조율 필요] 1. 장비 신청 마감(입사 5영업일 전=9/21) 경과 - Noah: 미제출 - Priya: 미제출 → 매니저는 금일 중 신청 완료 또는 대체 일정 확정 바랍니다. [내일(9/23) 마감 — 미발송] 2. 환영 이메일(입사 3영업일 전 마감) 3명 전원 미발송 → HR은 내일까지 발송 완료 바랍니다. [승인 미결 — 입사 전 확정 필요] 3. Noah 노트북 예외: 프로젝트 스폰서의 서면 승인이 없는 상태입니다. 요청 사실만으로는 승인으로 간주하지 않습니다. 승인이 없을 경우 기본 원칙대로 본인 장비 지참으로 안내됩니다. 스폰서 확인 요청드립니다. 4. Noah 고객데이터 접근: 매니저가 승인 의사를 밝혔으나, 정책상 매니저는 보안 승인을 대체할 수 없습니다. 보안 담당자의 별도 승인이 필요하며 현재 미결 상태입니다. 검토 요청드립니다. 5. Priya 고객데이터 접근: 보안 승인은 기록되어 있으나, 계정 생성과 접근 권한 부여는 별개 절차입니다. IT는 계정 생성 후 접근 권한을 별도로 부여해주시기 바랍니다. [확인 필요 — 기록 없음] - 노트북 재고 및 배송 가능일(Maya 원격 배송 포함) - 3명 IT 계정 생성 실제 진행 여부 - Maya 오리엔테이션 링크 발급 여부 - 9/28 09:00 리셉션 장비 수령 준비 상태(Noah, Priya) 입사일까지 시간이 촉박한 만큼, 위 항목별 담당자께서는 금일 중 회신 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.